The settlement
New York Attorney General Letitia James said on 9 September 2026 that VGW, the operator behind Chumba Casino, Global Poker and LuckyLand Slots, will pay $8 million to settle allegations that it ran an illegal online gambling business in the state. It is one of the largest financial resolutions yet in the campaign against so-called sweepstakes casinos.
According to the Attorney General's office, VGW offered slot-style and table games using virtual sweeps coins that players could redeem for cash or prizes. Investigators found customers effectively bought the coins by spending on the platforms, roughly a coin per dollar, which the office argued turned a nominally free-to-play sweepstakes into real-money gambling without a licence.
How the dual-currency model works
Sweepstakes casinos sit in a legal grey zone by running on two currencies. One is a play-money token with no cash value; the other is a promotional coin that can, in practice, be redeemed for money. Operators have long argued the model is a promotion rather than gambling, because a player can obtain coins without paying.
Regulators increasingly reject that framing. New York found VGW's platforms operated in the state from 2012, when Chumba launched, through 2025, with Global Poker added in 2016 and LuckyLand in 2018. The Attorney General had already sent VGW a cease-and-desist demand in June 2025, and the September settlement closes the loop on that earlier action.
“My office took action to stop these illegal platforms last year, and now we are holding VGW accountable for the damage done.”
A national crackdown
The VGW deal is the sharp end of a much wider push. On 10 June 2025, James's office issued cease-and-desist letters to 26 online sweepstakes operators at once, accusing them of offering slots, table games and even sports betting through redeemable virtual coins. Later that year, New York codified the position when Governor Kathy Hochul signed a formal ban on sweepstakes casinos into law in December 2025.
Other states moved in parallel. In late December 2025, Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti sent cease-and-desist letters to nearly 40 sweepstakes platforms, calling the structure an illegal lottery under the state constitution. He was blunt about the model, saying the one thing a player can be sure of is that an online sweepstakes casino is going to take their money.
Our take
The size of the VGW payment matters less than the precedent. By putting a dollar figure on years of unlicensed operation, New York has given other attorneys general a template, and it signals to the sweepstakes sector that a cease-and-desist letter is now a first step, not the last.
The open question is enforcement reach. Sweepstakes operators are often based offshore and pivot quickly, and the largest players run dozens of brands. Expect the next phase to focus on payment processors and app-store distribution, the choke points that keep these platforms in front of American players.
It is also worth noting what the settlement does not do. An $8 million payment is a cost of doing business for an operator that ran three brands in New York for more than a decade, and it does not by itself compensate individual players. The deterrent value lies in the pattern: a cease-and-desist in June 2025, a state ban by December, and a paid settlement by September 2026 is a timeline other regulators can copy.
Frequently asked
What is a sweepstakes casino?
An online platform that offers casino-style games using a two-currency system. One token has no cash value; a second promotional coin can be redeemed for cash or prizes, which regulators increasingly treat as unlicensed gambling.
What did VGW agree to?
VGW agreed to pay New York $8 million to settle allegations that its Chumba, Global Poker and LuckyLand brands operated illegal online gambling in the state between 2012 and 2025.
Is this only happening in New York?
No. New York banned sweepstakes casinos by law in December 2025, and states including Tennessee have sent cease-and-desist letters to dozens of operators. It is a national enforcement trend.
